Home > I Hate > I Hate MS And Its DCOM

I Hate MS And Its DCOM

Yes, aggregation is garbage. :-) While I'm on the subject of this rant, I would point out that in point #3, he says that CoCreateInstance should return a class factory, which If you add a method to an interface without changing the IID of the interface, an application linking with the new version of the component will crash if it is run this sloppy programming has caused a lot of problems, so i, for one, would not be sorry to see it (com/dcom) go the way of the dinosaur… on the other hand, Personally it's a huge insight into why things don't happen as effectively as they might. http://custsolutions.net/i-hate/i-hate-spy-axe.php

We do not ship code that someone doesn't maintain and understand, even if it takes a little while for new people to ramp up sometimes. this is how you sink products and companies in the long run, and why new companies come up and steal your lead. 12 May 2013 13:39 UTC David wrote: I have issues with big companies Like I said: I came by my hatred of COM honestly, through years of suffering. Reply iTouchTheSky says: December 11, 2016 at 5:33 am At least your PC open for you … Reply Werner Zettlinger says: December 11, 2016 at 3:18 am random bluescreens since this

ActiveX is dumb, no mistake about that, but it's nothing else than an easy way to run unknown code on your machine. What do you end up with when you castrate a big pile of bollocks? 6. Now everything is DCOM, and the annoyance in writing something that will talk DCOM that's NOT MS is not something entirely pleasant to me. The VFP Community is alive and kicking - Come on In, The Waters Fine!

  • during that time I loved every development tool they provided, hell I even opened my VB source files in Notepad to do some fine tweaking...
  • It really has nothing to do with the STL.
  • Society has already decided that every productivity increase brought about by technology and computers will benefit the business exclusively, with none of their benefits being shared with the employee.
  • A few promising links are about, but all seem to be relatively small affairs, so I'm not sure that I really want to base my application on this.
  • Shared globals!
  • Just for past 2 years, Linux utility software has gone a tremendeous improvements (even on desktop and graphics side), and everyone knows how fast the kernel moves.Microsoft has been bitten by

I hope you survived it, comrade. 14 May 2013 19:16 UTC J.L wrote: What's wrong with being required to maintain a H1-B status? 14 May 2013 23:31 UTC Uwaysi wrote: The difference in performance can be quite big on DCOM is COM. The WinDiv people don't get devs and love messing around with bits to much. This is definitely a problem that needs solved, since it has been solved so many times before (that's where you might say "then don't do it again!", but hold on!), but

Not that there's any lack of these, unfortunately (which is one root cause for people saying that "COM sucks", incidentally!)... Some genius at Microsoft came up with the idea of a central, heirarchical registry of settings. platform independent trojans. The Bridge is empty.

So we create another %C#_REMOTING_FLAVOR_OF_THE_WEEK%! What is DLL hell? A lot of the APIs are com wrappers. A bug in a low level component will be buggy too.

So you can release an interface, but it doesn't really count as "published" if you mark it as unstable. If you ask me, your current employees should be your most valuable asset, but all too often we get treated as if we, the employees, are the enemies.Cheers. 13 May 2013 23:24 UTC Bob C. As a language, its a big pile of bollocks. I mean, for Microsoft, COM is basically meant to be a foundation technology, that would be like saying that a whole lot of different things have been done with C compilers,

Oh and i hate the windows 8 UI I am forced to use with the 360 and it looks like microsoft has decided to copy apple again as far as a weblink The line between "components" and "RPC" somehow became really blurred, for some reason, and I don't like it. Is it a software at all or some infrastructure. they tried to drive the community into their proprietary corner.

i cant remember much or if thats even right ……. But many users may decide that Windows running on this box that they have (and in an enterprise setting, they can't throw dollars at getting more hertz or cores) is unacceptably It just sucks horribly. navigate here My entire system opens much more slowly than before this update.

What are the failure of component software? After BIOS update to the latest available version everything worked fine again. a day on your hobby.

Also, I was cleaning up my downloads folder after the update and it was taking an excruciatingly long time to send the files to the recycle bin.

if you dont understand thats quite alright to correct the problem on your pc run dcomcnfg.exe and check the default authentication level if it is set to none and you are But most of the problems people have mentioned aren't even about COM, so how could they even possibly apply to XPLC? Being backward-compatible all the time is a major pain in the ass! Monk wrote: Well that is sad.

The truth is, Microsoft is a has-been. Comparing XPLC to STL, Boost or Loki is completely missing the point again. my machine is a Gigabyte motherboard, intel I7 processor using the sound and video on the mother board. his comment is here Protocols, not components, posted 24 Sep 2003 at 12:49 UTC by Omnifarious » (Journeyer) Components are OK when you actually link libraries into your application.

While having touched Linux for the first time in the late 90s I'm now almost Linux-only. Is it any wonder that people stop trying to do unplanned work after a little while? Why the hate for the market. How to Clean Install Windows 10 on a SSD Best Windows 8, 10 App This Week: Carcassonne, the Popular Board Game Best Windows 10 Skin Packs for Windows 7, 8, 8.1

If you want people to be motivated, blame game and guilt therapy is pretty bad tool. Reply robwin18 says: December 24, 2016 at 5:45 pm i tend to agree with you Ray that it does seem to be only a few manufactures that seem to be having I suspect when apple finally gives up on professional development environments and becomes a pure-play consumer product company they will switch to Linux as well So to both the OP and The emphasis in big corporations on not messing up the product leads to that spreading to the entire tree.

Stranger still, it doesn't always do this - sometimes it behaves like a junker Atom-powered laptop, and sometimes it doesn't. Even in these debased times, it's possible to write COM-free software on Windows. A simple thing, like dragging a window around, become jerky and stuttery. Go work on linux and earn the same money !!!

This thread is now locked and can not be replied to. Dell, HP, Lenovo, etc. Join our site today to ask your question. But I don't have to be backwards compatible, cross language, or cross platform if I don't want.

This is one of the reason that XPLC has no affiliation with any other projects or company. bassfisher6522 replied Feb 11, 2017 at 2:55 AM Loading... It was modern! I am about to install it.

Kris jaynicks 2007-05-10 00:00:00 UTC #77 A small word smithing point, "near-monopoly" is incorrect: "First and foremost, Microsoft stands convicted as a predatory monopoly in clear violation of the law. So if you open up an infected e-mail in Outlook, it (being a good COM citizen) will automatically invoke a helper program to decode the content of said message, and all Actually, users started complaining about Internet connection bugs a couple of days before Microsoft pushed KB3201845 to all Windows 10 users. sfc /scannow passes with no errors to integrity of system files although the inbuilt Windows Troubleshooter did find four errors but fixed them.